A reference work, not a recommendation to use: this profile describes mechanism and evidence and does not replace medical advice. The claims come from marketing and forums and are tested here, not endorsed.
Claims checked
Skin rejuvenation: fewer wrinkles, firmer skin
Mixed resultsAfter laser treatment, no objective benefit in 13 people [7]. A systematic review reports reduced wrinkle volume and depth from a second randomized study [8]. Other frequently cited facial studies are small or appeared only as conference contributions, in part from the discoverers' own group [1][9].[1][9]
More hair growth
Single unconfirmed findingA randomized eyebrow study with 18 people reported more and thicker hair, published outside PubMed, product not chemically characterized [9]. The follicle study tested the related AHK-Cu, not GHK-Cu [4]. No study of scalp hair loss was found.
Wounds heal faster
Single unconfirmed findingA randomized, observer-blinded study from 1994 found greater wound closure and fewer infections [6]; confirmation by later studies was not found.
Rejuvenates the whole body and resets genes (injection)
Not studiedThe basis is gene expression analyses done by computer and in cells [1][3]. There is no study of systemic administration in humans [9][10].[1][3][9][10]
small studies: Every study behind this level and result had fewer than 100 participants. Small studies report larger effects on average than large ones, so the result is less certain.
Mechanism of action
Evidence map: GHK-Cu
GHK (glycyl-histidyl-lysine) occurs in blood plasma, saliva, and urine. According to the research group around Loren Pickart, who described the peptide in 1973, the plasma level falls from about 200 ng/ml at age 20 to 80 ng/ml at age 60; the same review, written at a skin care company, credits GHK with “resetting” at least 4000 genes “to a healthier state” [1]. What is established is an early laboratory effect: in fibroblast cultures, GHK-Cu increased collagen synthesis from 10⁻¹² to 10⁻¹¹ M, with a maximum at 10⁻⁹ M, without changing cell numbers [2]. The gene claim goes back to a study of lung tissue from people with COPD: using the Connectivity Map database, GHK was identified as a compound that reverses the gene expression pattern of emphysema-related destruction; in fibroblasts from COPD lungs, GHK restored collagen contraction [3]. This is a computational and cell-based finding, not evidence of rejuvenation in the body.
For hair growth, a Korean study is often cited, but it tested the related copper peptide AHK-Cu: it lengthened isolated human hair follicles and promoted division of papilla cells [4]. In the laboratory, copper from GHK-Cu passed through isolated human skin in measurable amounts [5]; this does not show whether intact GHK-Cu reaches the deeper skin layers. For copper as a nutrient and its forms, see the Copper profile.
In humans there are few controlled studies. In a randomized, observer-blinded study in diabetic foot ulcers, a GHK-Cu gel closed the wounds more than the vehicle (median area reduction 98.5% versus 60.8%), with fewer infections [6]. After CO2 laser treatment of facial skin, blinded assessors found no objective benefit for wrinkles, redness, or skin quality in 13 people; only satisfaction was higher [7]. A systematic review from 2026 found 18 preclinical studies and only 2 randomized studies for aesthetic uses [8]. A critical review from the same year rates the clinical evidence as sparse: the frequently cited facial studies are small or published only as conference contributions, an eyebrow study with 18 people was positive, and almost no study describes the actual copper binding of the product [9]. For injections of the kind offered on the gray market, reliable safety data in humans are lacking [10].
Targets
| Target | Type | Action | Key data | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collagen synthesis in fibroblasts | Other | Expression ↑ | from 10⁻¹² M, maximal at 10⁻⁹ M (cell culture) | Laboratory[2] |
| TGF-β signaling pathway (gene expression pattern) | Signaling pathway | Activator | Laboratory[3] | |
| Integrin β1 (lung fibroblasts) | Receptor | Expression ↑ | Laboratory[3] | |
| Copper(II) ions | Other | Binding | Laboratory[9] |
Effect profile
- Dopamine
- Noradrenaline
- Serotonin
- Acetylcholine
- Glutamate · AMPA
- Glutamate · NMDA
- GABA
- Histamine
- Orexin
- Adenosine
- Opioids
- Melatonin
- Neurotrophins
- Blood flownew blood vessel formation in wound and biomaterial models (animal, laboratory)[9]
- Nitric oxide
- Energy metabolism
- Insulin · glucose
- Inflammation · oxidativeanti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects in cell and animal models; not demonstrated clinically[9]
- Stress axis
- Testosterone axis
- Endocannabinoids
- Autophagy · senescence
- Immune system
- Lipid metabolism
- Coagulation · fibrinolysis
- Methylation
Routes of administration and bioavailability
Transdermal (through the skin) · Cream, serum, gel
In the laboratory, copper from GHK-Cu passed through isolated human skin [5]; microneedles and liposomes improved uptake into the skin in studies [8]. How much intact GHK-Cu reaches the target layer has hardly been studied [9].
Laboratory
Subcutaneous (under the skin) · Injection (gray market)
No published human study found; reliable safety data are lacking [10]. A review calls for dedicated testing of injectable preparations, including for free copper and allergies [9].
No data
Human studies
GHK-Cu gel in diabetic foot ulcers
Measured: percent wound closure, proportion with at least 98% healing, infections
Result: Median area reduction 98.5% versus 60.8% with vehicle; infections 7% versus 34%. Number of participants not given in the abstract.[6]
Human, randomised
Skin care with GHK-Cu after CO2 laser treatment
Measured: redness (computer analysis, blinded assessment), wrinkles, skin quality, questionnaire
Result: No objective difference in redness, wrinkles, or skin quality; higher satisfaction with GHK-Cu.[7]
Human, randomised
Risks and warnings
No safety data on injections
For injections offered on the gray market, reliable safety data in humans are lacking [10].
No data
Unclear composition
Copper binding, the proportion of free copper, and purity are mostly not stated for GHK-Cu products; efficacy and tolerability may depend on them [9].
No data
Contact allergy to copper
Copper is a known contact allergen in sensitive people; exposure rises with broken skin or injection [9].
No data
Theoretical: new blood vessel formation at an unwanted site
The vessel-promoting effect is desirable in wounds but could be unfavorable in tumors or pathological vessel growth in the eye; data on this are lacking [9].
No data
Fact check: common claims
- partly supported
“GHK-Cu makes wrinkles disappear”
One randomized study reported reduced wrinkle volume [8], another found no objective benefit [7]; many facial studies are small or published only as conference contributions [9].
- not supported
“GHK resets over 4000 genes to a young state”
The claim comes from a review by the discoverers' group [1] and rests on gene expression databases and cell experiments [3]; rejuvenation in the body has never been measured.
- not supported
“GHK-Cu injections rejuvenate the whole body”
No human study with systemic administration [9]; safety data are lacking [10].
- not supported
“GHK-Cu helps against hair loss”
Only one small eyebrow study [9] and a follicle study with the related AHK-Cu [4]; no study of scalp hair loss.
Pharmacokinetics
- Absorption
- Topical: limited skin passage measurable in the laboratory [5]. Systemic absorption not studied in humans.
- Half-life
- Not measured; a short half-life is expected for free GHK because of peptidases [9].
- Metabolism
- Expected breakdown to glycine, histidyl-lysine, and amino acids; released copper is bound to albumin, histidine, and ceruloplasmin [9].
- Entry into the brain
- Not studied.
Legal status
- Germany
- Widely used as a cosmetic ingredient [1]; no marketing authorization known, not checked in registers.
- EU
- No marketing authorization known; not verified.
- USA
- No marketing authorization known; not verified. Marketed directly to patients alongside other unapproved peptides [10].
Related compounds
- complex
- one of the two substances is a defined complex containing the other as central atom or component
Open questions
- How much intact GHK-Cu reaches the dermis after topical use?
- Do larger, independent, vehicle-controlled studies with chemically characterized products confirm the effect on wrinkles?
- What happens to the peptide and copper after injection, and is it safe?
References
- Pickart L, Vasquez-Soltero JM, Margolina A. GHK peptide as a natural modulator of multiple cellular pathways in skin regeneration. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:648108. doi:10.1155/2015/648108 · PubMed
- Maquart FX, Pickart L, Laurent M, Gillery P, Monboisse JC, Borel JP. Stimulation of collagen synthesis in fibroblast cultures by the tripeptide-copper complex glycyl-L-histidyl-L-lysine-Cu2+. FEBS Lett. 1988;238(2):343–6. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(88)80509-x · PubMed
- Campbell JD, McDonough JE, Zeskind JE, Hackett TL, Pechkovsky DV, Brandsma CA, et al. A gene expression signature of emphysema-related lung destruction and its reversal by the tripeptide GHK. Genome Med. 2012;4(8):67. doi:10.1186/gm367 · PubMed
- Pyo HK, Yoo HG, Won CH, Lee SH, Kang YJ, Eun HC, et al. The effect of tripeptide-copper complex on human hair growth in vitro. Arch Pharm Res. 2007;30(7):834–9. doi:10.1007/BF02978833 · PubMed
- Hostynek JJ, Dreher F, Maibach HI. Human skin penetration of a copper tripeptide in vitro as a function of skin layer. Inflamm Res. 2011;60(1):79–86. doi:10.1007/s00011-010-0238-9 · PubMed
- Mulder GD, Patt LM, Sanders L, Rosenstock J, Altman MI, Hanley ME, et al. Enhanced healing of ulcers in patients with diabetes by topical treatment with glycyl-l-histidyl-l-lysine copper. Wound Repair Regen. 1994;2(4):259–69. doi:10.1046/j.1524-475X.1994.20406.x · PubMed
- Miller TR, Wagner JD, Baack BR, Eisbach KJ. Effects of topical copper tripeptide complex on CO2 laser-resurfaced skin. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;8(4):252–9. doi:10.1001/archfaci.8.4.252 · PubMed
- Mokhtar J, Mohamad B, Haddad J, Said A, Menon A, Kreutz-Rodrigues L, et al. The regenerative potential of GHK-Cu in aesthetic medicine. Aesthet Surg J. 2026. Online ahead of print. doi:10.1093/asj/sjag169 · PubMed
- Mateescu DM, Gavrilescu DM, Mincioaga RI, Pah AM, Toma AO, Serban DV, et al. GHK-Cu as a bioactive metallopeptide and drug-delivery cargo: coordination chemistry, formulation science, therapeutic evidence, and a translational roadmap. Pharmaceutics. 2026;18(9):1077. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics18091077 · PubMed
- Mendias CL, Awan TM. Safety and efficacy of approved and unapproved peptide therapies for musculoskeletal injuries and athletic performance. Sports Med. 2026;56(8):1921–35. doi:10.1007/s40279-026-02437-0 · PubMed
How this profile was checked
Last reviewed: 2026-10-24. All sources with a DOI or PMID were resolved automatically via Crossref or doi.org and PubMed.
Translated from the German profile (version of 2026-10-24); translation checked on 2026-10-26.
Checked
- All 10 DOIs checked via Crossref, PMIDs via PubMed.
- In the full text [1]: plasma levels 200 ng/ml (age 20) and 80 ng/ml (age 60), first description in 1973 by Pickart, “at least 4,000 human genes … resetting DNA”, authors affiliated with Skin Biology; facial studies partly conference contributions.
- Key figures checked against abstracts: collagen from 10⁻¹²–10⁻¹¹ M, maximum 10⁻⁹ M [2]; Connectivity Map, COPD fibroblasts [3]; AHK-Cu, not GHK-Cu [4]; skin passage [5]; 98.5% vs. 60.8%, infections 7% vs. 34% [6]; 13 people, no objective benefit [7]; 20 studies, of which 2 RCTs [8].
- In the full text [9]: eyebrow study (n = 18, Procedia Multidiscip Res 2026), facial studies small or conference contributions, copper as a contact allergen, angiogenesis undesirable in tumors, expected pharmacokinetics, NCT07437586 without results.
- ClinicalTrials.gov (October 23, 2026): NCT07437586 (wound healing, Hudson Biotech, recruiting), NCT05932732 (cosmetic facial treatment, phase 4, no results), NCT07706361 (manufacturer's patch, not yet recruiting), NCT07888595 (aging clocks); no results.
- Cross-reference per guideline K1/G12 on October 24, 2026: related copper “complex” (backlink from copper → ghk-cu) and a referring sentence in the text without a new factual statement.
- Precision flags (m004, rules provisional, pending confirmation by Tilman), checked against the sources on October 26, 2026 (PubMed efetch, full texts as stated): “More hair growth” → “kleine_studien”: eyebrow study with 18 participants according to the full text of the review [9] (PMC13610439); the study itself is not in PubMed; [4] tested AHK-Cu and does not count.
Not verified
- Registry entry NCT07437586 comes from the same sponsor (Hudson Biotech) as an entry on TB-500 that describes itself as fictitious; not used as evidence.
- Number of participants, duration, and sponsor of the foot ulcer study [6] not in the abstract; full text not checked.
- Which second randomized study in [8] showed reduced wrinkle volume is known only from the review's abstract.
- The eyebrow study (Bo et al. 2026) is not listed in PubMed and was captured only via [9].
- The plasma levels come from a review by the discoverer group [1]; the primary measurement was not checked.
- Legal status as a cosmetic ingredient in the EU and as a drug not checked in registers.
No dosages, no sources of supply. This information does not replace medical advice.
Spotted an error or missing something?
Request a compound, suggest an improvement or report an error. Every message is read.
The website stores nothing. The button opens your email app with a pre-filled message.